Available nowOperational Analytics
Source-backed operational views from retained governed responses, with grain, periods, and quality conditions kept visible.
Authenticated snapshot analytics · scoring remains gated 

Evidence lens Inspect one reported period with its denominator and evidence boundary.
Each panel is showing its own dataset’s latest month, so the months may differ between panels.
Operational evidence / selected snapshotReported delivery is far behind procurement intent
Reported evidence1,910 target → 1,153 work orders → 134 supplied
7.0%supplied / target83 / 123 ULBs returned
Why it mattersWork orders cover 60% of target, while reported supply covers 7.0%.
Where to review75 ULBs report work orders and no vehicles supplied.
BoundaryThis measures procurement and delivery status, not fleet utilization or service quality.
Vehicles: planned, ordered and supplied
E-Auto Service Model · urban local body (ULB) records · July 2026
Reported stageQuantity · shared linear scaleShare of target
02Work orders issued1,153
60.4% Bar lengths show reported quantities, without minimum-width inflation. Shares use 1,910 target as their denominator; stages are not added together.
Delivery ratio7.0%83 / 12383 ULBs reported · 40 did not returnsupplied / targetWork-order ratio60%83 / 12383 ULBs reported · 40 did not returnwork orders / targetReported shortfall1,780target minus supplied Procurement stage pattern
Mutually exclusive returned-record stages · descriptive, not scored
83classified ULB records
75 / 83Largest reported group · July 2026Work order reported; supplied count is zero.Of classified ULB records in this source, not all Andhra Pradesh ULBs.
One shared denominator: 83 classified returned ULB records. Counts are not performance ratings.
No order issued5
Positive target; no work order or supply reported.
Ordered · none supplied75
Work order reported; supplied count is zero.
Partially supplied2
Some vehicles supplied; reported target not yet met.
Target matched0
Supplied count equals the reported target.
No returned records in this stage.
Above target1
Supply exceeds the reported target; retain for review.
Reported examplesNuzvidEluruName not matched
Zero-target review0
A rate is not computed where the denominator is zero.
No returned records in this stage.
Source Contrast
Two governed collection stories · preserved at their original grain
Definition reviewULB GRAINE-Auto procurementTarget → work orders → reported supply
1,910target1,153work orders134supplied
Do not mergeDifferent grain and apparently different source definitions DISTRICT GRAINCollection asset programmesLatest source-reported target and achievement
Door-to-Door E-Autos28 districts100%
Push Carts28 districts100%
Tri-Cycles28 districts100%
Same source · same period · same measureCompare ULBs on the same evidence.
E-Auto Service Model · July 2026 · ULB grain. Default cards show the largest source-reported gaps; they are not a score.
Shared absolute scale across the selected cards3 of 3 shown
supplied / target13%reported delivery gap175vehicles
Target200
Work orders200
Supplied25
supplied / target0%reported delivery gap158vehicles
Target158
Work orders50
Supplied0
supplied / target51%reported delivery gap99vehicles
Target200
Work orders140
Supplied101
Reading boundaryProcurement and delivery status only, not utilization or service quality. “Not returned” remains distinct from a reported zero.
Where to review
Largest deterministic reported delivery gaps · not a performance score
Evidence labelWhat this screen rests on- Bundled historical exports
- 44 full exports + 6 aggregate sources
- Bundled historical rows
- 6,509
- Entities observed
- 123 ULB candidates
- Source grain
- ULB, district, GP and secretariat
- Disputed values
- 12 across 2 datasets
- Missing measurements
- Held out · never counted as zero
- Cross-month comparisons
- Selected same-source pairs only
- Formal ratings eligible
- 0 entities · gates unmet