Explore supported changes and reported delivery gaps. Each comparison states its population and evidence limits.
Choose a subject comparison, then a district or ULB.
Collection reach × segregation · subject-specific categories
A number on a dot means several ULBs sit at exactly the same position, and the ULB selector lists every one. The dashed lines stay where they are when you filter by district.
Anakapalli · 17 positive-household secretariats of 17 paired · 12 Aug 2026
Meets the 80% collection reference and below the 80% segregation reference. This is a reported daily service position.
Native ULB code 1136. Only identical secretariat/date records are collapsed. Both exports agree on native identity and household denominators. Quantities below use the same paired records; percentages are ratios of sums.
| Secretariat code | Households | Collected | Segregated | Code check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21136001 | 929 | 926 | 564 | Consistent |
| 21136002 | 1,472 | 1,472 | 1,121 | Consistent |
| 21136003 | 1,183 | 1,183 | 605 | Consistent |
| 21136004 | 1,388 | 1,380 | 868 | Consistent |
| 21136005 | 1,209 | 1,204 | 870 | Consistent |
| 21136006 | 963 | 956 | 678 | Consistent |
| 21136007 | 950 | 945 | 761 | Consistent |
| 21136008 | 1,432 | 1,370 | 781 | Consistent |
| 21136009 | 822 | 814 | 415 | Consistent |
| 21136010 | 836 | 833 | 487 | Consistent |
| 21136011 | 1,587 | 1,587 | 1,396 | Consistent |
| 21136012 | 1,507 | 1,480 | 1,010 | Consistent |
| 21136013 | 900 | 898 | 490 | Consistent |
| 21136014 | 1,281 | 1,280 | 1,092 | Consistent |
| 21136015 | 1,275 | 1,263 | 816 | Consistent |
| 21136016 | 1,027 | 1,027 | 909 | Consistent |
| 21136017 | 1,279 | 1,256 | 954 | Consistent |
No cross-programme Diagnostics identity is inferred from a similar ULB name.
Whole ULB groups are held out when any paired secretariat needs geographic-code review. Code differences can reflect geographic grain; they are not automatically source errors. Zero collection leaves the segregation ratio undefined.
Draft analytical references, not approved targets. The initial 80% lines are explicit review guides. Change them to inspect sensitivity; a ULB on a line meets that reference. Positions never change when a reference changes, only categories.
Why one day? The retained window carries household denominators on 16 days, but substantial collection figures on only 12 August. The other 15 days contain mostly stored zeros; these do not establish that collection stopped. We therefore compare ULBs on the supported reference day, rather than rank their service over the whole window.
Collection percentages below describe stored reports and changing daily populations, not a service-performance trend.
2026-08-12: 112 of 116 ULBs carry positive collection · 63.7% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-13: 5 of 106 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.4% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-14: 6 of 107 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.3% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-15: 4 of 103 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.4% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-16: 2 of 111 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.2% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-17: 7 of 111 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.4% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-18: 2 of 109 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.4% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-19: 1 of 105 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.1% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-20: 4 of 111 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.4% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-21: 5 of 102 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.2% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-22: 5 of 95 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.3% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-23: 1 of 91 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.1% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-24: 2 of 90 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.3% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-25: 4 of 90 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.5% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-26: 3 of 74 ULBs carry positive collection · 1% recorded collection / households.
2026-08-27: 1 of 34 ULBs carry positive collection · 0.5% recorded collection / households.
Definitions. Collection = summed collected households / summed total households. Segregation = summed reported segregating households / summed collected households. The application interprets garbage_segregation as households, pending departmental definition confirmation; it is not waste tonnage or an independent environmental outcome.
Retained sources. msw_door_to_door_collection_api: 64,368 raw rows, 644 pages, retrieved 2026-09-08 · waste_egregation_api: 64,368 raw rows, 644 pages, retrieved 2026-09-08. Both sources are paired by secretariat code and day, then summed by native ULB code. The builder fails closed on conflicts, missing measures, unmatched records or impossible containment. One source-reported day, not a sustained or overall performance rating. Whole ULBs with native/enriched code differences are held out; matching codes are not external master certification. Where the native district code is blank or the text NULL (Markapuram), the same row's LGD district code is used and counted in districtCodeFromLgdSecretariats. Benchmarks are draft analytical references, not departmental targets.
No performance label is assigned before every required evidence gate passes.
82 of 82 residual names carry a local decision; formal sign-off is still required.
Local review only · formal approval pending6 of 44 retained datasets carry LGD codes, reaching 20% of observed entities. 6 district labels map to two different LGD districts inside one source.
Required before scoringOperational and outcome periods have not been aligned for comparison.
Required before scoringThe retained outcome evidence reports 2024. Operations are from 2026.
Required before scoringNobody has agreed the thresholds yet, so there is nothing to score against.
Required before scoringCollection and segregation both key on a numeric secretariat code, both report the same 4,023 codes on 2026-08-12, and they agree on the household denominator for every one. No names are matched, so nothing here rests on an inference, which is why identity, period and denominator finally pass. Performance still does not.
Both sources key on sachivalayam_code. 4023 codes in collection, 4023 in segregation, 0 present in only one, 0 disputed. No name matching is involved.
Both measures are read from the same reported day, 2026-08-12. No period is bridged and no figure is carried forward.
0 of 4018 secretariats disagree on total households between the two sources.
One reported day. A single day describes a day; it does not establish how an entity performs, and nothing here should be read as a trend.
No thresholds, weights or directionality have been agreed. Without an approved policy there is nothing to score against, whatever the data supports.
This is the closest the product has come to a scoreable cohort, and it is still not one. The two gates that remain shut are not data problems that more pulling would fix: one reported day cannot establish performance, and no scoring policy exists to score against. Positions are shown; no entity is ranked or labelled.
1,697 secretariats reported no collection on this day and are not plotted. They have no segregation rate because there is no denominator. That is absent evidence, not a zero, and placing them at the origin would invent a reading.
One reported day, joined on a numeric secretariat code present in both sources. Identity, period and freshness are established; performance is not. A single day is not a basis for scoring, and no scoring policy has been approved.
Joined on sachivalayam_code: 4,023 codes in collection and 4,023 in segregation, 0 present in only one, 0 held out for disagreeing repeats, 0 disagreeing on total households. Segregated households never exceed collected households in any secretariat (0 breaches), which is the containment the two measures must obey.
Six retained datasets carry LGD district and mandal codes beside the departmental label, a mapping the source asserts rather than one this product inferred. That makes it evidence. It does not make it correct.
6 departmental district labels map to more than one LGD district inside a single source, and 6 district mappings pair labels that are not spelling variants of each other. The supplied mapping cannot be adopted as canonical identity until the source resolves them.
One departmental district label mapped to two different LGD districts inside a single dataset. Each of these is the source disagreeing with itself, not a naming question, so none of them can be resolved here.
Crosswalk workbench · review whether different source names refer to the same urban local body
The review queue is closed in this browser. These decisions improve joinability, but they are not an authoritative state crosswalk until formally signed off.
Locally approved aliases make previously disconnected retained rows reachable. Inspect recovered cells.
Similarity ranks, it never decides. Candidates are district-scoped. Atmakur K in Kurnool scores 0.86 against ATMAKUR-N in Nellore, and is held back rather than matched. Decisions are a local working copy, not an approved crosswalk.
No queue items match this filter.
Read procurement stages together without mixing sources or years.
83 candidates share 28 coordinate positions. Larger dots group identical counts; positions are not shifted to separate them.
ap_citizen360.sasa_sac_machinery_e_autos_service_model_api · sasa_sac_machinery_e_autos_service_model_api · ULB grain · July 2026. Each dot uses two counts from the same source record. No name crosswalk, national-rank association, delay estimate or performance score is inferred. Overlapping names can be browsed individually.
65 ULBs holding both figures · not a performance score
A varied historical-outcome comparison. Other operational measures can be paired, but most reported IHHL completions and vehicle-supply counts are zero, not missing. The two axes here are two years apart, so position shows contrast, never cause.